This isn't the first thread where things like this are discussed...but I totally agree with @Harvest that the lack of mod/GM/admin cohesion or democratic process is severely lacking which ultimately prevents ideas/suggestions on this server to move forward.
I hope @Larva reads this feedback and gives it some critical thought.
I can't speak for other GM's, but from what I observed, @R-78 critically reviews feedbacks/suggestions and looks at it from an overall picture, taking into consideration player engagement, balance, and how it affects the server short term and long term. She looks at the whole picture and either agrees or disagrees with suggestions with good feedback as to WHY something is a good idea or bad idea. Even when she does her regular duties in game (redeems, happy hours, etc.) she does it with complete fairness to both the player and the server.
When you have someone like that on your team, shouldn't you be trusting them more that they're doing their due diligence to eliminate the noise and present ideas that would actually be improvements to increase player engagement?
I mean that's the whole point...isn't it? Running a place isn't cheap (server space for game/domain/forums/manpower/etc.). You have a DT system in place which generates revenue to cover all that...but the only way it will benefit is if you have more people playing..right? Or am I missing something?
EDIT: There are probably other members of the team like @Soly who do a crapton on the backend to keep things running smoothly and I apologize for not including you. I can only speak for what is front-facing.