From a GM's perspective, I'd imagine such rule would be a really uncomfortable one, so regarding that I am comprehensive that any decision will be criticized, of course. As for maturity, I wouldn't say the majority of the board is on that side, regarding these kind of issues at least. Quoting that thread about the stolen POST, I can't imagine making a thread about how someone who never agreed with you stole an item from you would be the mature thing to do. But pardon me, that's just an opinion. The utopia of the rule is to have the individual drop thing, though that will probably bring up other issues, just like everything. I'm not questioning the rule as of right now, I understand it well, however, the rules is not being followed in a literal way if they did really remove the item from Karlito, as he never agreed to the "dibs proposal" and did not even seem to understand them. I believe there should be a bit of understanding and empathy, I imagine being Karlito, not knowing the language, just playing because I love the game, getting a rare item and the staff taking it away because a guy made a thread about how he claimed it. That's just discouraging at its biggest form. Also, I enjoy conversations like this one, I do hope I'm not hurting anybody's feelings, just looking to have a mature talk on the matter